Post by @ilumium@eupolicy.social

Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
@jwildeboer @social.wildeboer.net
Public en edited

PIR, the Public Interest Registry ("Based in Reston, Virginia, Public Interest Registry is a nonprofit organization created by the Internet Society to manage the .ORG domain."), seems to have put autistici.org on status serverHold and that is why you cannot resolve their name anymore. This is what can happen to your .org domain name when the Trump administration decides to add you to the OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) list.

Jan Penfrat
@ilumium @eupolicy.social

@jwildeboer I'm new to much of this, so apologies if this is obvious: Where do DNS resolvers get their information from, PIR or Gandi? Could Gandi and supportive DNS resolvers ignore those flags and continue to resolve the domain name?

Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
@jwildeboer @social.wildeboer.net
Unlisted en edited

@ilumium Ultimately PIR is authoritative on all .org domains. Technically gandi could keep an active entry in their DNS zones, but it would be in violation of the DNS delegation rules. They risk their designated registrar status with such things.

Jan Penfrat
@ilumium @eupolicy.social

@jwildeboer Ah okay that's fair, thank you. Do you know if anyone has formally asked EUrid if they care about the SDN list or would resist pressure? Am a bit worried about their business membership:

eupolicy.social/@ilumium/11720

Jan Penfrat @ilumium@eupolicy.social

TIL that while the .eu TLD registrar #EUrid is technically a non-profit org, it is very much dominated by #business interests.

Would EUrid roll over US #sanctions and block domain names or would they resist? πŸ€”

List of EUrid members including Business Europe, eCommerce Europe, IAB Europe and SME United. With text describing how members have the power to sack the Board etc.
List of EUrid members including Business Europe, eCommerce Europe, IAB Europe and SME United. With text describing how members have the power to sack the Board etc.
Jan Wildeboer 😷:krulorange:
@jwildeboer @social.wildeboer.net

@ilumium I am not aware of any official communication or statement on this and I don't expect there will ever be. The answer will be a variant of "we respect the laws, rules and regulations and will not publicly discuss proceedings". But there are some court rulings that establish a high level of independence, so I am not too worried.

Jan Penfrat
@ilumium @eupolicy.social

@jwildeboer Thank you that's really helpful. πŸ™

Nemo_bis 🌈
@nemobis @mamot.fr

@jwildeboer @ilumium One could try a more oblique question, such as "are there contingency plans for [adverse event]", from the more blatant like "being cut off SWIFT" to the more anodyne like "a temporary disruption in payment processing" to the abstract "an erosion of the reserves due to delays in receivables".

(The question is not unreasonable, for example I would make sure to not send staff travelling abroad without a backup payment method off the Visa/Mastercard/etc. circuit.)