Sign in

Post by @xenotar

stefano
Stefano Marinelli
@stefano @bsd.cafe
17h Public

On second thought, I realize only now that part of the team tested littleFedi on FreeBSD and OpenBSD, I also tested it on NetBSD and illumos... and no one has actually tested the Linux builds yet.

The exact opposite of what usually happens 馃檪

#littleFedi #OwnYourData #RunBSD #illumos #Linux

Replying to @stefano@bsd.cafe
xenotar
xenotar
@xenotar
16h Public en

@stefano@bsd.cafe Where can I download the Linux builds? I would like to test littleFedi on Armbian (32 and 64 bits)

Replying to @xenotar
stefano
Stefano Marinelli
@stefano @bsd.cafe
16h Public

@xenotar the source code hasn't been released, yet. But it will be.

Replying to @stefano@bsd.cafe
xenotar
xenotar
@xenotar
16h Public en

@stefano@bsd.cafe I misunderstood; I thought the "builds" referred to compiled binaries.

Replying to @xenotar
stefano
Stefano Marinelli
@stefano @bsd.cafe
15h Public

@xenotar we have compiled binaries but not released to the public, yet

Replying to @stefano@bsd.cafe
rootnode
rootnode
@rootnode @snac.wollwage.com
13h Public
@stefano@bsd.cafe in what ways is it different from say snac2? Relying on a DB? I love snac2 for its minimalism but can鈥檛 run it redundant because of the lack of DB.
Replying to @rootnode@snac.wollwage.com
stefano
Stefano Marinelli
@stefano @bsd.cafe
12h Public

@rootnode snac2 is minimal and small. It鈥檚 well engineered and light. littleFedi is in go and the binary is larger, bringing with it more dependencies, but still trying to be as lightweight and minimal as possible, while supporting all the possible features (like local timelines, bubbles, blog generation, etc). It supports SQLite and, for larger instances, PostgreSQL and the possibility to run more instances on the same DB, to make it more scalable.