dais-e

@daisy Created:

At the moment mostly used as a test account.
Main account: https://sfba.social/@daisE

Pronouns: E / they / them (just if you really want to care)

RSS
76 posts
hidden followers
hidden following
Replying to @strk
dais-e
@daisy

@strk @stefano
Do you mean in fedilab the highlighted note on the right bottom corner of a post? it even suggests it's a link but leads nowhere here.
And it happens on other posts, too. But some have "web" or even nothing there... @stefano@mastodon.bsd.cafe

Replying to @fasnix

@fasnix
If so, i hope there'll be an option to turn it off. ;-)
@stefano

Replying to @fasnix

@fasnix
My problem was: the picture shows (for me a kind of) eggs instead of circles and a weird yellow and even cut the background on the side of the eggs (while i only know it completely surrounded by yellow).
@RHW@mastodon.au

Boosted by dais-e
Screenshot of my confirmed signature for this ECI
Screenshot of my confirmed signature for this ECI

If you are an EU citizen, please consider signing this citizen initiative:

Stop Killing The Internet: No Digital ID & No Age Verification
citizens-initiative.europa.eu/

This is no stupid change(.)org petition.

1
Replying to @luc@chaos.social
dais-e
@daisy
Unlisted en edited

@luc@chaos.social
Same here. I didn't vote no, because i'm living in Germany (for more than 20 years now) but I have really no idea what it should be and have it never seen. (Something different with real circles and a different yellow, but definitely not in this "yellow" and never cropped like this.)

@fasnix@littleone.littlefedi.social

Replying to @miiko

@miiko
I like this feature very much. Did you try the option in the settings to hide replies?
@stefano

dais-e
@daisy
Unlisted de edited

@abuerkl@literatur.social
(Wie geschrieben: ) mit /deaktiviertem/ JavaScript?
Bei der Aktivierung von JavaScript funktioniert es auch hier, aber reproduzierbar ohne nicht.
Dazu kommt ein JavaScript von wp.com (Statistic?) und damit eine Übertragung der IP nach außerhalb der EU, ohne einen entsprechenden Hinweis in den Datenschutzbedingungen. M.E. ein unerwartetes und unerfreuliches Datenschutzproblem... (Das ist auch der Haupt-Grund warum ich Seiten ohne JavaScript teste...)

Replying to @ploum@mamot.fr

@ploum@mamot.fr
What is HN?

Replying to @stefano

@stefano
Thank you and good morning! Good luck with all your tasks! 🤗

@abuerkl@literatur.social
Hmm, in meinem Firefox ohne JavaScript sehe ich nur eine große schwarze leere Seite. 🤷
@@nick_lenzen@fosstodon.org

Boosted by dais-e
Anne Applebaum
@anneapplebaum @journa.host

The MAGA ideologues have been shouting for yes about a conspiracy to censor them that never existed. But they have used the false story as an excuse to do a lot of damage.
Read here:
theatlantic.com/ideas/2026/09/

Boosted by dais-e
David Revoy
@davidrevoy @framapiaf.org
Panel 1. Cepper, the gothic sorceress, stands on her high chair, in her painting workshop, with an empty canvas in front of her on the easel. Her expression is blank, staring in the void. On his perch nearby, her Avian Intelligence (AI) Parrot speaks out loud a notification.  
> Parrot: "Breaking news: *Penguin Academy* authorizes grimoire contributions made with Avian Intelligence."  
> Parrot: "Third major magic school this week after the *Pointy Hat* and *Daemon*."  
> Cepper: "..."
Panel 1. Cepper, the gothic sorceress, stands on her high chair, in her painting workshop, with an empty canvas in front of her on the easel. Her expression is blank, staring in the void. On his perch nearby, her Avian Intelligence (AI) Parrot speaks out loud a notification. > Parrot: "Breaking news: *Penguin Academy* authorizes grimoire contributions made with Avian Intelligence." > Parrot: "Third major magic school this week after the *Pointy Hat* and *Daemon*." > Cepper: "..."
Panel 2. The Parrot leans forward, studying Cepper's face. She hasn't moved.  
> Parrot: "I thought that would make you furious."  
> Cepper: "No. It's been like this every day for weeks now, so much so that I've lost my ability to feel outraged..."
> Cepper (smaller): "And all motivation..."
Panel 2. The Parrot leans forward, studying Cepper's face. She hasn't moved. > Parrot: "I thought that would make you furious." > Cepper: "No. It's been like this every day for weeks now, so much so that I've lost my ability to feel outraged..." > Cepper (smaller): "And all motivation..."
Panel 3. General shot in the workshop, Parrot process while Cepper slowly pick one brush from a pot aside of the canvas.  
> Parrot: "So what are you going to do?"  
> Cepper: "Paint what I actually feel."
Panel 3. General shot in the workshop, Parrot process while Cepper slowly pick one brush from a pot aside of the canvas. > Parrot: "So what are you going to do?" > Cepper: "Paint what I actually feel."
Panel 4. Close up of Cepper applying a brush stroke on the canvas. Her voice is quiet, her eyes still blasé, but trying to focus on the canvas. She made a first step.
> Cepper: "If this resonates with someone... that will be well enough."  
> Cepper: "Enough to not feel alone in this."
Panel 4. Close up of Cepper applying a brush stroke on the canvas. Her voice is quiet, her eyes still blasé, but trying to focus on the canvas. She made a first step. > Cepper: "If this resonates with someone... that will be well enough." > Cepper: "Enough to not feel alone in this."
🤗 2
dais-e
@daisy
Public de edited

@nick_lenzen@fosstodon.org
@atarifrosch@fedifreu.de
https://i42.eu/eauto
Auf htmly ohne notwendige Cookies, Google fonts oder sonst sowas.

Replying to @francois
dais-e
@daisy

@francois
Yes, good morning and welcome! 🤓
@stefano @himysyed

Boosted by dais-e
Golden Retriever GF
@GoldenRetrieverGF @blahaj.zone
Slurs, Homophobia, Transphobia, Tim Curry, HIV

I'm going to add my two cents. I was born in 87. It means I have memories of the Aids Epidemic allbeit the end. It was still on the news. The first ever movie I went to in theaters was Beauty and the Beast. I was conviced I would be terrified of the Beast. I should have been afraid of Gaston but I digress.

My mom wanted me to be terrified of something else. She told me the bitter, filthy queers were putting AIDs needles in theater seats so we suffered like "they" did. One of her godly children could not be a filthy queer.

I remember bullies trying to beat and stone me. Tho it was generally more insults than fists thrown at me, both were done. Queer, Faggot, woman. So filthy I deserve AIDs. I remember high profile people being fired in the late 90s and early 2000s after coming out. I remember my sister coming home with a ring on her finger from her girlfriend and the resultant screaming. She ate her gal pals out in the closet after that.

Long story short there was no flags hanging at the UN. There was no argument for them to be taken down because nobody would dare to put them up. There was no safe place. There was hatred. There was bullying and there was closets.

My sister once decided to stay up late and watch Rocky Horror Picture show to rebel against my parents. It was forbidden. It was for queers and liberals. Not for good Christian "heterosexual children". What Rocky Horror picture show was and still is, is community for those of us robbed of it. The idea that I could see a rainbow flag in a mall or hanging from the Landesrat or the Bundestag has brought a tear to my eyes. There was
nothing.

And for my lesbian Grandmother it was even worse. In the 70s that film could have ended Tim Curry. It became an icon. It became a meeting place for LGBT everywhere. Are the terms outdated? Sure but when I was a kid there really was L and G and both of those were either a social or true death sentence. The vernacular for LGBT people has changed dramatically in my lifetime.

I don't see people antagonising him for retreating to the only place capitalism hasn't gotten it's grubby hands "in space" or for the Cardinal Richelieu. I don't see people antagonizing him in for starring in a film where a frog and a pig love eachother. I see liberals and leftists antagonizing a cultural treasure that has become a safe space for trans and otherwise queer people.

Whether you mean it or not. Whether you know it or not. Whether you respect it or not. By attacking Tim Curry and Rocky Horror you are shrinking our safe spaces and our safety. Stop being a puritantical little bitch. You aren't helping. You are demonizing Rocky Horror exactly like my mother did. Just using different words.

It's always concerning to me how much liberals and leftists are obsessed with not being transphobic. It's discirimination when a neo nazi exposes a trans person and puts them in danger. It's abuse when a parent cuts a child of from the LGBT community. It's just doxxing and caring about what's right when a white leftist does it.

Here's a hint, shut your mouth if you can't respect our safe spaces and our history. That absolutely and 100% includes Rocky Horror Picture show.

Replying to @fasnix
dais-e
@daisy
Public en edited

@fasnix
Yes, one of my favorite Restaurants stays only on Instagram for a while now, too. It drives me nuts not even being able to see the menu or changed opening hours. I even reserved them a nice Mastodon account on their local city instance but they prefer now to update their opening hours only on Google maps... 🤷
@erinaceus@chaos.social @jeypawlik@comicscamp.club

dais-e
@daisy
Public en edited

@erinaceus@chaos.social

I was never on Instagram for even more reasons, but I get why people ="everyone" want it on Instagram. If your question was serious:
- it's not about a website it's about one universal all day used app
- they still think it's a community and it's great to be where cool people are and sharing the same space (like an exclusive club)
- it's easier for them (being in the Instagram app all day) to like, share and engage
- any serious account or obvious advantage kind of justifies their Instagram addiction
- it's just what everyone does, why wouldn't you make it easy for everyone, too?

@jeypawlik@comicscamp.club

Replying to @fasnix
dais-e
@daisy
Local en edited

@fasnix @stefano I use the settings at the beginning only so often till everything is as expected - in my best case scenario this means one time completely from the beginning to the top. That's how I do it with every new service/app/... And going from the top to the bottom anyway the order is nothing that even interests me...

Later I would visit the settings only in the rare circumstances it's really necessary. There is the table of content all I really needed.

But if there would have to be a change for the order, in that case I would group those settings which are likely getting to change later more often to the top. And place those who are most likely a one time thing at the bottom. Combined with a "search settings" option.

I guess this would most likely result in a completely different order than suggested from you.

If I would somehow think about grouping and ordering those in a somehow "most logic" for "most people" I would still make differences of your suggestions, but I don't know if it really makes sense everyone here moves now around different points some steps more up or down.

I like having the blog close to the profile, because it's a kind of logic to start with the basics for the service(s) and in my point of view they go together and are one point I like about littlefedi and separates it from e.g. mastodon. Littlefedi is for me not another mastodon but something special with this blog integration. Placing it far on the bottom looks weird to me and maybe logic for people taking littlefedi as a simple substitute for mastodon instead of a fedi-blog-system, too.

So for my case. If anything would improve the settings order for me any further: a settings search option - but in general I'm fine with any order.
I would just keep the blog option further above because it's one of the USPs of littlefedi for me and goes together with the profile...

But in general everything my beloved little computer people decide is really fine for me there.

P.S. Only here I'm using the settings way more often than normal because of the testing. But this wouldn't be the case in a pure normal user usage.

Boosted by dais-e
The Conversation U.S.
@TheConversationUS @newsie.social

Decades of research shows boys and girls are equally wired to connect from day one. But boys are nudged toward toughness over tenderness, given fewer chances to practice empathy and subtly discouraged against connection.

Load older posts