Post by @stefano
We鈥檙e currently preparing #littleFedi for release under the #MIT license.
As part of that work, the GPL-licensed code previously included in the project has been removed or replaced. We鈥檙e now reviewing the repository to make sure the licensing information is clear and consistent throughout.
16 likes
Ferrebam again@ferrebam
Georg Sassen@georgsassen@pfeifling.de
joany@joany@bsd.cafe
tionisla@tionisla
Wesley Moore@wezm@mastodon.decentralised.social
mark hysted@markhysted@federate.social
Root Moose@RootMoose@bsd.cafe
Brendan@brendan@social.brendans-bits.com
bpl@bpl@snac.bsd.cafe
Tim Chase@gumnos@bsd.cafe
oxy@oxy@bsdlab.au
pepdmin@pepdmin
Michael W Lucas 
@mwl@io.mwl.io
packet@packet@bsd.cafe
馃彴Christophe S.鉂処ceEnchanter馃Β@r3vlibre@mastodon.tetaneutral.net
Aslak Raanes@aslakr@mastodon.social
@Nux@fosstodon.org I was in favor of the BSD-3-Clause. Some were for the MIT. But there were a few GPL components. In the end, the MIT prevailed. However, it can still be modified until the release, as to date no code has been distributed.
@miniBill@mastodon.uno it's not been released, yet, so it's not a relicense. It's an agreement on how to release it.
@stefano 鈿狅笍 Niche question alert. Can littlefedi handle a use case where the server is, for example social.hysted.com but the usernames are say mark@hysted.com (social component removed)? A bit niche, but handy for people using their own domains.
@markhysted@federate.social @@stefano@littleone.littlefedi.social not niche but quite common and yes, it is already supported