Local timeline
"Neurodivergent advocacy in a collapsing society has to extend beyond supporting inclusion in the world as it was. It has to become part of building the forms of life that remain possible as that world begins to fail."
"Masked Twice: Neurodivergent Advocacy in a Collapsing Society
What happens when neurodivergent people are asked to fit into systems that are starting to fail?"
https://adrianlambert.substack.com/p/masked-twice-neurodivergent-advocacy
#AdrianLambert #Neurodiversity #Society #Collapse #Inclusion
"Cities are Intensive Livestock Systems, and Humans are the Cattle
You are more dependent than you think.
Chapter 1: The City Is Not an Escape from Ecology
We do not think of ourselves as livestock - not the way we think of pigs, sheep or cows. But perhaps we should, and the place to start is where most of us live.
Cities are the ecological equivalent of intensive livestock systems for Homo sapiens.
That may sound extreme, because modern culture has trained us to see cities as evidence of human advancement. The city is where humanity supposedly became civilised. It is where we conduct and celebrate culture, politics, finance, medicine and technology, and tell ourselves that we have risen above the constraints of land, soil, weather and food.
That interpretation mistakes abstraction for ecological transcendence.
Humans do not escape ecology by building cities. Through cities, we reorganise ecological dependence into forms that are invisible to us in our daily lives.
Ignorance by design.
A feedlot concentrates animals in a simplified artificial environment. Their food is produced elsewhere. Their waste becomes a technical problem. Their movement is constrained. Their bodies are reorganised around production and output.
The modern city concentrates human bodies at high density, imports energy and biomass from elsewhere, converts those flows into economic activity and waste, and presents the arrangement as civilisation.
Feedlots and cities perform the same function for different species.
(...)"
https://adrianlambert.substack.com/p/cities-are-intensive-livestock-systems
Hello, friends at littleOne!
I'm slowly recovering from the "after EuroBSDCon" queue of things to do, and I'll put some time and effort on littleFedi in the coming days.
I've forwarded a list of bugs & features to the team and they worked on it, so I'll merge them in the coming days. Stay tuned!
Agak males baca Murders in The House of Omari. Pacenya lambat banget
@_elena@mastodon.social @yivi_privacybydesign@mastodon.nl
This solution has been in place for many years and all one's attributes, like e-mail address, age, stay on the phone.
@_elena@mastodon.social @benroyce @patrickleavy
Here in The Netherlands we have a means to share attributes anonymously. This used to be the IRMA app, but has been renamed to @yivi_privacybydesign@mastodon.nl and works like a charm. I am sure people involved in that project can give details if that can
be rolled out EU wide.
It is a shame too few people use it
@francois
So, what's your point?
That Go would be a "bad" programming language"?
That it would be a bad choice to use Go for littlefedi?
That everybody should abandon littlefed because of the choice that Go was selected as the programming language to use for developing littlefedi?
What's your point in pointing out especially @stefano?
As far as I know, the team that developed littlefedi contacted him beforehand him becoming kind of the "spokesperson" (and "chief developer"?) for the team that stays invisible in the background.
It's not even sure if the decision to use Go for developing littlefedi was made by Stefano or the team.
Can you proof that it was solely his decision?
That, therefore, he would be a "bad" decision-maker?
Again, what's your solution in blaming Stefano for littlefedi having been developed using Go?